When students reach the point when they are choosing their options for further study - when only English, maths and science are compulsory - my subject suffers tremendously. In other words, hardly anybody picks it. This pains me because I have come to admit to myself that, as a teacher, I must shoulder some of the resonsibility. And I have decided that it is partly due to the fact that my lessons, and my delivery of these lessons, have not been sufficiently interesting and engaging. This is a hard pill to swallow and it has taken me a long time to come round to this way of thinking. I genuinely believe that I am a very good, organised, likeable, harsh-but-fair sort of teacher who gets on well with and manages to educate all but the really horrible kids, and even some of those. However, I am not the finished article and I know that I am still learning my trade, a trade that is constantly evolving.
One of my main flaws is that, to date, I have allowed myself to be wrongly directed by other, more senior and supposedly more experienced members of staff. I am referring specifically to people who also teach my subject. Mr HOD is the most obvious example: As a twenty year man, he displays no flexibility whatsoever and I often wonder how he manages to relate to the kids, particularly when he usually has trouble being social with the other adults in the staff room. I have therefore made a strong decision to distance myself almost completely from the prescriptive curriculum. I am keen to break from the rigidity that binds me, including abandoning the dreaded textbooks that have, sadly, often served as my crutch. My students are able to use wonderful technology such as interactive whiteboards, the internet, mp3 players and mobile 'phones. As am I. The problem is that I do not do so often enough. In my opinion, these devices can and should be used very frequently in the classroom, assuming that the boundaries are clear and the educational benefits are evident. I intend to move towards a more ICT-based way of teaching as a means to re-engage my students.
In recent lessons, as a prelude to this shift in method, I have discussed the aforementioned ideas with each of my classes. The prospect of change has been well-received, even by the crazies in my most challenging class. They all seem to be as excited as I am.
Over the next few weeks I hope to start using more hardware and more software in my lessons, including asking for homework to be e-mailed to me in advance of class rather than handing out books and sheets of paper. When used for the appropriate reasons, i-pods and mobiles will hopefully become as much a part of my lessons as exercise books and pens. All of this will of course require a lot of hard work and effort on my part but I am keen to push ahead with things. Mistakes will undoubtedly be made. Some things will work and some things will not. I must not be daunted by the fluidity of my job. I must try harder.
Thursday, 11 September 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

8 comments:
If I may ask, what is the subject you teach?
You commented on my distincition between lessons that teach and lessons that occupy students - I was thinking of my own colleagues. They teach out of the textbook, religiously. One worksheet after another... which makes planning very easy, but doesn't do much to teach.
Our district is big on technology, which is great because they're giving us the tools we need for me to do things how I want (or hope to do... For ex, we have a website where I can post assignments and students submit their work online, sending me the document as an attachment). I plan on bringing in outside sources as much as possible, using the textbook as a guide to tell me what to teach, but I'll decide how to teach it.
:)
Great to see those clips rather than links...I guess you figured it out. Good work!!!
OnTeaching: Thank you for your comments. Watching the clips will let you know my subject.
Fidgety- Yes, I managed to sort it out! Thanks for your help.
I am a former teacher, and as someone who taught a subject that wasn't compulsory for GCSE - History - I was delighted when not many of my students chose it. Especially when those who DID choose it were the polite, respectful, well-behaved and (sometimes) bright ones. The others - well, trying to teach them was such an uphill struggle I just gave up.
Hi UST! Congratulations on your 50th post! You are definitely more creative when it comes to the hi-tech stuff than me. In fact, our school has banned all electronics this year, so I couldn't do the things you are proposing to do even if I wanted to.
I am a firm believer in teachers having different styles, and I really believe kids benefit from that. A student who doesn't relate well to me, might relate very well to you and vice-versa. When it comes to teaching, I definitely don't believe in "one size fits all."
I am not anti-textbook, but for my American History classes I wrote my own textbook about ten years ago, and I'm very happy about how it has worked out.
I'm sorry I didn't respond to this earlier, but you know how things get during the school year. There are days when you have time, and there are others when you're absolutely swamped.
Dennis- Thank you for taking the time to read and comment. I am appalled, but not at all surprised, that your school has banned the use of electronics. What are the reasons behind such a decision? Surely a member of staff who wishes to pursue other avenues of delivering his/her subject for the benefit of the students should be allowed to do so. The response ought to be one of encouragement, not of censorship and control.
Find the teachers who are good - whatever their subject - and learn from them. Ignore the bad ones. You'll be fine.
Post a Comment